TwitterFacebookDiscord

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Simpson gene"

Wikisimpsons - The Simpsons Wiki
(Occam's Razor: new section)
(Occam's Razor)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Occam's Razor ==
 
== Occam's Razor ==
 
 
Could we simplify or omit that unreadable pseudo-science section about the 'Biological interpretation of the episode' it's ridiculous and written so that only the writer and their ego can read it. (the slightly infuriated) [[User:Hutchy01|Hutchy01]] ([[User talk:Hutchy01|talk]]) 13:35, January 5, 2015 (EST)
 
Could we simplify or omit that unreadable pseudo-science section about the 'Biological interpretation of the episode' it's ridiculous and written so that only the writer and their ego can read it. (the slightly infuriated) [[User:Hutchy01|Hutchy01]] ([[User talk:Hutchy01|talk]]) 13:35, January 5, 2015 (EST)
 +
:It should stay. It is not unreadable. / [[User:Loco87|'''<font color=C23232><font size="4"><font face="Agency FB">Loco</font></font></font><font color=92CC58><font face="Cursive"><font size="3">87</font></font></font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Loco87|<font color=78D1F0><font face="Courier New">'''TALK'''</font></font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Loco87|<font color=Tomato><font face="Viner Hand ITC">Contribs</font></font>]])</sup> 13:46, January 5, 2015 (EST)

Latest revision as of 14:46, January 5, 2015

This is a talk page, where you can leave messages and comments about the Simpson gene article.

Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~).
New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page.
New to Wikisimpsons? Welcome!
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. Only talk about edits to the article. If you want to ask questions about the content, ask on Wikisimpsons Answers.

Some talk page guidelines:

Be polite
Assume good faith
No personal attacks
Don't bite the newcomers!

Occam's Razor[edit]

Could we simplify or omit that unreadable pseudo-science section about the 'Biological interpretation of the episode' it's ridiculous and written so that only the writer and their ego can read it. (the slightly infuriated) Hutchy01 (talk) 13:35, January 5, 2015 (EST)

It should stay. It is not unreadable. / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 13:46, January 5, 2015 (EST)