User talk:Mythigator/Archive 2 - Revision history

Solar Dragon: Removing red link

2024-07-27T23:30:10Z

Removing red link

SolarBot: /* Twitter */replaced: Ned 'n' Edna's Blend Agenda → Ned 'n Edna's Blend Agenda

2021-09-21T22:12:06Z

‎Twitter: replaced: Ned 'n' Edna's Blend Agenda → Ned 'n Edna's Blend Agenda

SolarBot: /* The Incredibly Simulating Life of Sideshow Mel credits */replaced: Radioactive Man and Fallout Boy in Catch of the Day → Catch of the Day

2020-09-12T23:21:06Z

‎The Incredibly Simulating Life of Sideshow Mel credits: replaced: Radioactive Man and Fallout Boy in Catch of the Day → Catch of the Day

SolarBot: /* Twitter */replaced: Ned 'N' Edna's Blend → Ned 'n' Edna's Blend Agenda

2018-06-09T13:45:47Z

‎Twitter: replaced: Ned 'N' Edna's Blend → Ned 'n' Edna's Blend Agenda

Solar Dragon: Text replace - "snpp.com" to "simpsonsarchive.com"

2014-12-13T22:51:16Z

Text replace - "snpp.com" to "simpsonsarchive.com"

Mythigator: Mythigator moved page User talk:Mythigator to User talk:Mythigator/Archive 2 without leaving a redirect: Over 70,000 characters ... Time to archive!

2013-12-08T22:42:25Z

Mythigator moved page User talk:Mythigator to User talk:Mythigator/Archive 2 without leaving a redirect: Over 70,000 characters ... Time to archive!

Mythigator: /* Do you really want to say that Teddy Kennedy is alive? Really? */

2013-12-03T07:54:52Z

‎Do you really want to say that Teddy Kennedy is alive? Really?

24.141.5.202: /* Do you really want to say that Teddy Kennedy is alive? Really? */

2013-12-03T07:45:17Z

‎Do you really want to say that Teddy Kennedy is alive? Really?

Mythigator: /* Do you really want to say that Teddy Kennedy is alive? Really? */

2013-12-03T07:28:25Z

‎Do you really want to say that Teddy Kennedy is alive? Really?

24.141.5.202: /* Do you really want to say that Teddy Kennedy is alive? Really? */

2013-12-03T04:08:18Z

‎Do you really want to say that Teddy Kennedy is alive? Really?

@@ Line 148: / Line 148: @@
 :::I got to the sandbox through a link on the Recent Changes page. Now that I've actually seen it, I think it's pretty clever. One thing worth adding is a template for quotes narratives, in order to get text to be ''[italicized and enclosed inside square brackets]''. It could be called something like <nowiki>{{Qu-n}}</nowiki>, maybe? -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:10, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
 ::::Actually I think that feature is already availabe. Template:Qu-a is for actions (put inside square brackets and italicized). If you want the action on a whole line, just type <nowiki>{{Qu-a|line|Some person was doing this.}}</nowiki>. {{User:Randomno/sig4}} 15:32, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
-:::::{{Qu-a|slapping forehead}} D'oh! You're right, indeed it is. Cool! -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:39, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
+:::::slapping forehead D'oh! You're right, indeed it is. Cool! -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:39, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
-::::::{{Qu-a|line|Randomno tuts}} {{User:Randomno/sig4}} 15:50, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
+::::::line|Randomno tuts {{User:Randomno/sig4}} 15:50, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
 :::::::Well, this is freaking cool! Are these templates officially available for use on the wiki, then? -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 16:46, 22 May 2012 (EDT)

@@ Line 122: / Line 122: @@
 ::::::"apple sticker" tweet? {{User:Randomno/sig4}} 14:56, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
 :::::::The one you linked to.--{{User:Cook879/sig}} 15:01, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
-::::::::The one referred to as having been put online while "[[Ned 'n' Edna's Blend Agenda]]" was showing. The full text of the tweet is on the episode's References tab. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:03, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
+::::::::The one referred to as having been put online while "[[Ned 'n Edna's Blend Agenda]]" was showing. The full text of the tweet is on the episode's References tab. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:03, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
 :::::::::I get that tweet as 1:01 AM, 14th May. {{User:Randomno/sig4}} 15:09, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
 ::::::::::You're seeing the times in your own time zone, then. To change them to Eastern time, subtract 5 hours; to change them to Pacific, subtract 8 hours. There are a couple of short periods each year when you only need to subtract 4 hours for Eastern and 7 for Pacific, because USA Daylight Savings Time and British Summer Time aren't in effect for exactly the same time frames during the year. If you want to go into further detail, what say we open a Time Zone topic on '''your''' talk page (since you would be the one in need of the information) and later (probably tonight my time) I'll get the details figured out and post them for you. Is that OK by you? -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:29, 14 May 2012 (EDT)

@@ Line 241: / Line 241: @@
 Hey Myth, have you got any credits in what you are using for these comics, 'cos ''Simpsons Comics Royale'' doesn't have any. If you don't, as we don't have credits for {{KC|1}} yet I'll redirect it to ''[[Simpsons Comics Royale/Credits]]'' (it has a section for every writer and artist of the stories, so it's the best alternative).--{{User:Cook879/sig}} 07:28, 9 September 2012 (EDT)
 *I don't have any credits for the Mel stories, and this after doing some Googling ... if I'd hit paydirt, I would've posted 'em. Comic credits are so easy to handle (especially by comparison with TV episode credits) that I tend to post those pretty early in the process of doing the writing for a comic story article. Redirecting to the ''Royale'' credits is a pretty good solution. It looks better than a redlink, and if we happen to learn later of specific credits for the Mel stories, there is of course no problem about puting them in. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 11:31, 9 September 2012 (EDT)
-::Ok, just though I'd check, as ''[[Radioactive Man and Fallout Boy in Catch of the Day]]'' had credits on its page, but not in ''Royale''.--{{User:Cook879/sig}} 12:00, 9 September 2012 (EDT)
+::Ok, just though I'd check, as ''[[Catch of the Day]]'' had credits on its page, but not in ''Royale''.--{{User:Cook879/sig}} 12:00, 9 September 2012 (EDT)
 ----
 My girlfriend scored all 3 Krusty Comics issues for me for Valentine's Day. After taking a quick look at them, I don't see any credits for the Sideshow Mel stories, but I'll go through them with a fine-toothed comb and see what turns up. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 08:13, 14 February 2013 (EST)

@@ Line 122: / Line 122: @@
 ::::::"apple sticker" tweet? {{User:Randomno/sig4}} 14:56, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
 :::::::The one you linked to.--{{User:Cook879/sig}} 15:01, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
-::::::::The one referred to as having been put online while "[[Ned 'N' Edna's Blend]]" was showing. The full text of the tweet is on the episode's References tab. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:03, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
+::::::::The one referred to as having been put online while "[[Ned 'n' Edna's Blend Agenda]]" was showing. The full text of the tweet is on the episode's References tab. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:03, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
 :::::::::I get that tweet as 1:01 AM, 14th May. {{User:Randomno/sig4}} 15:09, 14 May 2012 (EDT)
 ::::::::::You're seeing the times in your own time zone, then. To change them to Eastern time, subtract 5 hours; to change them to Pacific, subtract 8 hours. There are a couple of short periods each year when you only need to subtract 4 hours for Eastern and 7 for Pacific, because USA Daylight Savings Time and British Summer Time aren't in effect for exactly the same time frames during the year. If you want to go into further detail, what say we open a Time Zone topic on '''your''' talk page (since you would be the one in need of the information) and later (probably tonight my time) I'll get the details figured out and post them for you. Is that OK by you? -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 15:29, 14 May 2012 (EDT)

@@ Line 219: / Line 219: @@
 ::::Marge '''might''' have been in a hurry, but I don't specifically remember her vacumming up anything else she wasn't supposed to. She finished the job, missed Maggie, saw the movement in the vacuum cleaner bag, and opened the bag to find Maggie inside. As far as I recall, the only anamolous thing in the bag was Maggie. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 16:17, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
 :::::She said "twelve minutes, a new personal best", but I can't find which episodes. /[[User:AleWi|AleWi]] 23:37, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
-::::::WooHoo!! Found it, thanks to Ale supplying the "personal best" line. The scene happens at the very beginning of "[[The Great Louse Detective]]". It doesn't have a capsule on snpp.com, which explains my lack of luck before. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 00:10, 29 June 2012 (EDT)
+::::::WooHoo!! Found it, thanks to Ale supplying the "personal best" line. The scene happens at the very beginning of "[[The Great Louse Detective]]". It doesn't have a capsule on simpsonsarchive.com, which explains my lack of luck before. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 00:10, 29 June 2012 (EDT)
 == Editor meeting ==
@@ Line 285: / Line 285: @@
 ::BTW, [[Evan Conover|that article already exists]]. -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 10:53, 24 March 2013 (EDT)
 :::I put the subtitles on to see how to spell the name and it was "Conniver". Which is correct? ~ [[User:Phinbart|'''<font color=#FBB917>Phinbart</font>''']] ([[User talk:Phinbart|<font color=#5ACEC1>'''talk'''</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Phinbart|<font color=#52D017>'''contribs'''</font>]]) <small><sup>'''<font color=#F76541></font></sup></small></small> 10:54, 24 March 2013 (EDT)
-:::::It's "Conover" per snpp.com [http://www.snpp.com/episodes/2F13.html], and I'll vouch for it to the death based on multiple viewings of the episode. The subtitle you saw is the result of a transcription error. I'd surmise that the transcriber wasn't familiar with the ''Simpsons'' universe and thus typed "Conniver" in the interest of getting the job done and because it's the real word that sounds most like "Conover". -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 11:04, 24 March 2013 (EDT)
+:::::It's "Conover" per simpsonsarchive.com [http://www.simpsonsarchive.com/episodes/2F13.html], and I'll vouch for it to the death based on multiple viewings of the episode. The subtitle you saw is the result of a transcription error. I'd surmise that the transcriber wasn't familiar with the ''Simpsons'' universe and thus typed "Conniver" in the interest of getting the job done and because it's the real word that sounds most like "Conover". -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] 11:04, 24 March 2013 (EDT)
 ::::::I'll merge the articles then. ~ [[User:Phinbart|'''<font color=#FBB917>Phinbart</font>''']] ([[User talk:Phinbart|<font color=#5ACEC1>'''talk'''</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Phinbart|<font color=#52D017>'''contribs'''</font>]]) <small><sup>'''<font color=#F76541></font></sup></small></small> 11:05, 24 March 2013 (EDT)
 :::::::Could you delete Evan Conniver and File:Evan Conniver.png? Thanks, ~ [[User:Phinbart|'''<font color=#FBB917>Phinbart</font>''']] ([[User talk:Phinbart|<font color=#5ACEC1>'''talk'''</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Phinbart|<font color=#52D017>'''contribs'''</font>]]) <small><sup>'''<font color=#F76541></font></sup></small></small> 11:11, 24 March 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:42, December 8, 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:54, December 3, 2013
Line 337:		Line 337:
	::OK, here's something you should be aware of ... "Revert" does not mean '''only''' using the "revert" option. If an editor makes a change and another editor undoes it, that is also reversion. Point being, it is entirely possible to run afoul of the "only revert once" rule without using the revert option. So if you have the notion that not using the revert option renders you immune from getting into trouble over that rule, please get it out of your head at once as that is wrong. -- [[User:Mythigator\|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator\|talk]]) 02:28, December 3, 2013 (EST)		::OK, here's something you should be aware of ... "Revert" does not mean '''only''' using the "revert" option. If an editor makes a change and another editor undoes it, that is also reversion. Point being, it is entirely possible to run afoul of the "only revert once" rule without using the revert option. So if you have the notion that not using the revert option renders you immune from getting into trouble over that rule, please get it out of your head at once as that is wrong. -- [[User:Mythigator\|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator\|talk]]) 02:28, December 3, 2013 (EST)
	:::Again, please just calm down on the "get it into your head" aggressive tactics stuff. I'm hoping to just be pleasant as possible to a total stranger and only hope for that in return. So you're changing what a revert is on the fly? It's coming across that this all REALLY matter to you that I feel like crap or something. There's no need for any of this really? So you'll pretend that Teddy Kennedy, Steve Allen, whoever else is still alive. The idea that every single character is assumed alive until implicitly made clear in an episode that he/she isn't seems weird since you run it the other way that every character is assumed dead until implicitly stated to be alive. I made a case against the current policy and tried to counter on points brought up against, been ignore or dismissed or ignored on that point. I didn't do it to cause offensive, unlike terms "get it through your head," but because I honestly thought it was weird to have Teddy Kennedy, clear as day a characterization of a real person who has died, marked as alive. Yet it's fine and obviously it isn't that major. Again, I still think it's weird and yes, editing "deceased" then editing "blank" as a comprise seem different enough to not be starting a revert edit war. The revert policy seems to be about not starting edit wars and going to TalkPages to discuss the issue. That's what I did. I'm allowed to think what I like and so are you about silly stuff like this. Wikis are suppose to be fun, right? Please, I've ask repeatedly for a tone down on the aggressiveness that feels very needless. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202\|24.141.5.202]] 02:45, December 3, 2013 (EST)		:::Again, please just calm down on the "get it into your head" aggressive tactics stuff. I'm hoping to just be pleasant as possible to a total stranger and only hope for that in return. So you're changing what a revert is on the fly? It's coming across that this all REALLY matter to you that I feel like crap or something. There's no need for any of this really? So you'll pretend that Teddy Kennedy, Steve Allen, whoever else is still alive. The idea that every single character is assumed alive until implicitly made clear in an episode that he/she isn't seems weird since you run it the other way that every character is assumed dead until implicitly stated to be alive. I made a case against the current policy and tried to counter on points brought up against, been ignore or dismissed or ignored on that point. I didn't do it to cause offensive, unlike terms "get it through your head," but because I honestly thought it was weird to have Teddy Kennedy, clear as day a characterization of a real person who has died, marked as alive. Yet it's fine and obviously it isn't that major. Again, I still think it's weird and yes, editing "deceased" then editing "blank" as a comprise seem different enough to not be starting a revert edit war. The revert policy seems to be about not starting edit wars and going to TalkPages to discuss the issue. That's what I did. I'm allowed to think what I like and so are you about silly stuff like this. Wikis are suppose to be fun, right? Please, I've ask repeatedly for a tone down on the aggressiveness that feels very needless. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202\|24.141.5.202]] 02:45, December 3, 2013 (EST)
		+	::::Make an account and you'll be taken more seriously and most likely get more respect. Unfair, true, but that's how it is. And the "get it out of your head" part is not referring to the "dead vs. alive" policy, but to what constitutes reversion. I thought you were laboring under the impression that not using the "revert" option would keep you from getting into trouble. If I was mistaken, my bad and my apologies. But I'm okay with eating a little crow in the interest of making sure you're informed about the issue. -- [[User:Mythigator\|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator\|talk]]) 02:54, December 3, 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:45, December 3, 2013
Line 336:		Line 336:
	:Whoa, calm down with "go edit somewhere else" nonsense. If you don't like other people editing here, don't use wikis (it's the whole point of them versus a real encyclopedia with an academy). Yes, I disagree with your policy and still do. Teddy Kennedy is just as dead in ''The Simpsons'' universe as he is the real world rather then some Sci-Fi stuff or "They do not influence each other in any way." as if ''The Simpsons'' created Steve Allen or Bob Hope out of thin air. The Simpsons is real world when we want it to be and not when we don't. It's a satire which is directly related to reality and couldn't work otherwise. It's a blurry area and different fans with disagree in good faith about it (at I hope so). I did not revert because there's a "revert" option and I didn't use it. I left it blank rather then deceased. Please, there is no need for this hostility. I haven't been edit in bad faith or to create problems with you or anyone else. Please, the Internet is a weird place where people get really upset when somebody else is wrong on it. I still don't agree with this policy, but you don't. That's fine. The world still keeps on spinning either way. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202\|24.141.5.202]] 23:05, December 2, 2013 (EST)		:Whoa, calm down with "go edit somewhere else" nonsense. If you don't like other people editing here, don't use wikis (it's the whole point of them versus a real encyclopedia with an academy). Yes, I disagree with your policy and still do. Teddy Kennedy is just as dead in ''The Simpsons'' universe as he is the real world rather then some Sci-Fi stuff or "They do not influence each other in any way." as if ''The Simpsons'' created Steve Allen or Bob Hope out of thin air. The Simpsons is real world when we want it to be and not when we don't. It's a satire which is directly related to reality and couldn't work otherwise. It's a blurry area and different fans with disagree in good faith about it (at I hope so). I did not revert because there's a "revert" option and I didn't use it. I left it blank rather then deceased. Please, there is no need for this hostility. I haven't been edit in bad faith or to create problems with you or anyone else. Please, the Internet is a weird place where people get really upset when somebody else is wrong on it. I still don't agree with this policy, but you don't. That's fine. The world still keeps on spinning either way. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202\|24.141.5.202]] 23:05, December 2, 2013 (EST)
	::OK, here's something you should be aware of ... "Revert" does not mean '''only''' using the "revert" option. If an editor makes a change and another editor undoes it, that is also reversion. Point being, it is entirely possible to run afoul of the "only revert once" rule without using the revert option. So if you have the notion that not using the revert option renders you immune from getting into trouble over that rule, please get it out of your head at once as that is wrong. -- [[User:Mythigator\|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator\|talk]]) 02:28, December 3, 2013 (EST)		::OK, here's something you should be aware of ... "Revert" does not mean '''only''' using the "revert" option. If an editor makes a change and another editor undoes it, that is also reversion. Point being, it is entirely possible to run afoul of the "only revert once" rule without using the revert option. So if you have the notion that not using the revert option renders you immune from getting into trouble over that rule, please get it out of your head at once as that is wrong. -- [[User:Mythigator\|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator\|talk]]) 02:28, December 3, 2013 (EST)
		+	:::Again, please just calm down on the "get it into your head" aggressive tactics stuff. I'm hoping to just be pleasant as possible to a total stranger and only hope for that in return. So you're changing what a revert is on the fly? It's coming across that this all REALLY matter to you that I feel like crap or something. There's no need for any of this really? So you'll pretend that Teddy Kennedy, Steve Allen, whoever else is still alive. The idea that every single character is assumed alive until implicitly made clear in an episode that he/she isn't seems weird since you run it the other way that every character is assumed dead until implicitly stated to be alive. I made a case against the current policy and tried to counter on points brought up against, been ignore or dismissed or ignored on that point. I didn't do it to cause offensive, unlike terms "get it through your head," but because I honestly thought it was weird to have Teddy Kennedy, clear as day a characterization of a real person who has died, marked as alive. Yet it's fine and obviously it isn't that major. Again, I still think it's weird and yes, editing "deceased" then editing "blank" as a comprise seem different enough to not be starting a revert edit war. The revert policy seems to be about not starting edit wars and going to TalkPages to discuss the issue. That's what I did. I'm allowed to think what I like and so are you about silly stuff like this. Wikis are suppose to be fun, right? Please, I've ask repeatedly for a tone down on the aggressiveness that feels very needless. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202\|24.141.5.202]] 02:45, December 3, 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, December 3, 2013
Line 335:		Line 335:
	-- [[User:Mythigator\|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator\|talk]]) 20:36, December 2, 2013 (EST)		-- [[User:Mythigator\|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator\|talk]]) 20:36, December 2, 2013 (EST)
	:Whoa, calm down with "go edit somewhere else" nonsense. If you don't like other people editing here, don't use wikis (it's the whole point of them versus a real encyclopedia with an academy). Yes, I disagree with your policy and still do. Teddy Kennedy is just as dead in ''The Simpsons'' universe as he is the real world rather then some Sci-Fi stuff or "They do not influence each other in any way." as if ''The Simpsons'' created Steve Allen or Bob Hope out of thin air. The Simpsons is real world when we want it to be and not when we don't. It's a satire which is directly related to reality and couldn't work otherwise. It's a blurry area and different fans with disagree in good faith about it (at I hope so). I did not revert because there's a "revert" option and I didn't use it. I left it blank rather then deceased. Please, there is no need for this hostility. I haven't been edit in bad faith or to create problems with you or anyone else. Please, the Internet is a weird place where people get really upset when somebody else is wrong on it. I still don't agree with this policy, but you don't. That's fine. The world still keeps on spinning either way. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202\|24.141.5.202]] 23:05, December 2, 2013 (EST)		:Whoa, calm down with "go edit somewhere else" nonsense. If you don't like other people editing here, don't use wikis (it's the whole point of them versus a real encyclopedia with an academy). Yes, I disagree with your policy and still do. Teddy Kennedy is just as dead in ''The Simpsons'' universe as he is the real world rather then some Sci-Fi stuff or "They do not influence each other in any way." as if ''The Simpsons'' created Steve Allen or Bob Hope out of thin air. The Simpsons is real world when we want it to be and not when we don't. It's a satire which is directly related to reality and couldn't work otherwise. It's a blurry area and different fans with disagree in good faith about it (at I hope so). I did not revert because there's a "revert" option and I didn't use it. I left it blank rather then deceased. Please, there is no need for this hostility. I haven't been edit in bad faith or to create problems with you or anyone else. Please, the Internet is a weird place where people get really upset when somebody else is wrong on it. I still don't agree with this policy, but you don't. That's fine. The world still keeps on spinning either way. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202\|24.141.5.202]] 23:05, December 2, 2013 (EST)
		+	::OK, here's something you should be aware of ... "Revert" does not mean '''only''' using the "revert" option. If an editor makes a change and another editor undoes it, that is also reversion. Point being, it is entirely possible to run afoul of the "only revert once" rule without using the revert option. So if you have the notion that not using the revert option renders you immune from getting into trouble over that rule, please get it out of your head at once as that is wrong. -- [[User:Mythigator\|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator\|talk]]) 02:28, December 3, 2013 (EST)

@@ Line 334: / Line 334: @@
 # I changed my mind about saying the third thing. If you keep going the way you're going, you'll hear it soon enough anyway, whether it's from me or someone else.
 -- [[User:Mythigator|Mythigator]] ([[User talk:Mythigator|talk]]) 20:36, December 2, 2013 (EST)
-:Whoa, calm down with "go edit somewhere else" nonsense. If you don't like other people editing here, don't use wikis (it's the whole point of them versus a real encyclopedia with an academy). Yes, I disagree with your policy and still do. Teddy Kennedy is just as dead in ''The Simpsons'' universe as he is the real world rather then some Sci-Fi stuff. The Simpsons is real world when we want it to be and not when we don't. It's a blurry area and different fans with disagree in good faith (at I hope so). I did not revert because there's a "revert" option and I didn't use it. I left it blank rather then deceased. Please, there is no need for this hostility. I haven't been edit in bad faith or to create problems with you or anyone else. Please, the Internet is a weird place where people get really upset when somebody else is wrong on it. I still don't agree with this policy, but you don't. That's fine. The world still keeps on spinning either way. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202|24.141.5.202]] 23:05, December 2, 2013 (EST)
+:Whoa, calm down with "go edit somewhere else" nonsense. If you don't like other people editing here, don't use wikis (it's the whole point of them versus a real encyclopedia with an academy). Yes, I disagree with your policy and still do. Teddy Kennedy is just as dead in ''The Simpsons'' universe as he is the real world rather then some Sci-Fi stuff or "They do not influence each other in any way." as if ''The Simpsons'' created Steve Allen or Bob Hope out of thin air. The Simpsons is real world when we want it to be and not when we don't. It's a satire which is directly related to reality and couldn't work otherwise. It's a blurry area and different fans with disagree in good faith about it (at I hope so). I did not revert because there's a "revert" option and I didn't use it. I left it blank rather then deceased. Please, there is no need for this hostility. I haven't been edit in bad faith or to create problems with you or anyone else. Please, the Internet is a weird place where people get really upset when somebody else is wrong on it. I still don't agree with this policy, but you don't. That's fine. The world still keeps on spinning either way. [[Special:Contributions/24.141.5.202|24.141.5.202]] 23:05, December 2, 2013 (EST)