Talk:Treehouse of Horror - Revision history

ThehorseshoeCrab: /* Canonocity */

2024-02-13T01:41:05Z

‎Canonocity

Nick97: /* Canonocity */

2013-04-29T22:21:25Z

‎Canonocity

Gazlene the Pork Girl: Added a Canonocity section to discuss the supposed canonocity.

2013-04-29T22:14:51Z

Added a Canonocity section to discuss the supposed canonocity.

Cook879bot: renaming template, replaced: {{Article Project Episodes}} → {{Article Style Guide Episodes}}

2012-06-21T21:08:17Z

renaming template, replaced: {{Article Project Episodes}} → {{Article Style Guide Episodes}}

Cook879bot: replaced: {{Article Project Episodes}} → {{Article Project Episodes}}

2012-04-13T00:31:12Z

replaced: <center>{{Article Project Episodes}}</center> → {{Article Project Episodes}}

J36miles: adding episode template

2010-06-02T23:21:30Z

adding episode template

New page

{{Talkheader}}
<center>{{Article Project Episodes}}</center>

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, February 13, 2024
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Is this really non-canon? It involves Bart and Lisa telling fictional stories rather than the fictional stories being shown themselves without a storyteller. I'm a bit stuck if it is canon or non-canon. I would understand that all the later ones are non-canon, but somehow I think this one is canon. [[User:Gazlene the Pork Girl\|Gazlene the Pork Girl]] 18:14, 29 April 2013 (EDT)		Is this really non-canon? It involves Bart and Lisa telling fictional stories rather than the fictional stories being shown themselves without a storyteller. I'm a bit stuck if it is canon or non-canon. I would understand that all the later ones are non-canon, but somehow I think this one is canon. [[User:Gazlene the Pork Girl\|Gazlene the Pork Girl]] 18:14, 29 April 2013 (EDT)
	:It's probably just easier to say that the whole episode is non-canon, that way there aren't any unnecessary, special canonicity rules created for a single episode. Also, nothing really happens during the Bart and Lisa parts that would be relevant enough to include in a canon article anyways, so it would be largely unneeded. That's my guess anyways. --[[User:Nick97\|'''<font color=darkorange>Nick97</font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Nick97\|<font color=peach>'''talk'''</font>]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Nick97\|<font color=turquoise>'''contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 18:21, 29 April 2013 (EDT)		:It's probably just easier to say that the whole episode is non-canon, that way there aren't any unnecessary, special canonicity rules created for a single episode. Also, nothing really happens during the Bart and Lisa parts that would be relevant enough to include in a canon article anyways, so it would be largely unneeded. That's my guess anyways. --[[User:Nick97\|'''<font color=darkorange>Nick97</font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Nick97\|<font color=peach>'''talk'''</font>]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Nick97\|<font color=turquoise>'''contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 18:21, 29 April 2013 (EDT)
		+	:but is it really, it's better to make sure people know that the episode is canon. Also it's not the only treehouse of horror episode to have bart and lisa as a framing device, there are also the canon episodes tales from the public domain, Revenge Is a Dish Best Served Three Times, Now Museum, Now You Don't, Love, Springfieldian Style, Four Great Women and a Manicure and so on --[[User:ThehorseshoeCrab]] 8:40, 12 february, 2024

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, April 29, 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Canonocity==		==Canonocity==
	Is this really non-canon? It involves Bart and Lisa telling fictional stories rather than the fictional stories being shown themselves without a storyteller. I'm a bit stuck if it is canon or non-canon. I would understand that all the later ones are non-canon, but somehow I think this one is canon. [[User:Gazlene the Pork Girl\|Gazlene the Pork Girl]] 18:14, 29 April 2013 (EDT)		Is this really non-canon? It involves Bart and Lisa telling fictional stories rather than the fictional stories being shown themselves without a storyteller. I'm a bit stuck if it is canon or non-canon. I would understand that all the later ones are non-canon, but somehow I think this one is canon. [[User:Gazlene the Pork Girl\|Gazlene the Pork Girl]] 18:14, 29 April 2013 (EDT)
		+	:It's probably just easier to say that the whole episode is non-canon, that way there aren't any unnecessary, special canonicity rules created for a single episode. Also, nothing really happens during the Bart and Lisa parts that would be relevant enough to include in a canon article anyways, so it would be largely unneeded. That's my guess anyways. --[[User:Nick97\|'''<font color=darkorange>Nick97</font>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Nick97\|<font color=peach>'''talk'''</font>]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Nick97\|<font color=turquoise>'''contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 18:21, 29 April 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, April 29, 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talkheader}}		{{Talkheader}}
	{{Article Style Guide Episodes}}		{{Article Style Guide Episodes}}
		+
		+	==Canonocity==
		+	Is this really non-canon? It involves Bart and Lisa telling fictional stories rather than the fictional stories being shown themselves without a storyteller. I'm a bit stuck if it is canon or non-canon. I would understand that all the later ones are non-canon, but somehow I think this one is canon. [[User:Gazlene the Pork Girl\|Gazlene the Pork Girl]] 18:14, 29 April 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, June 21, 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talkheader}}		{{Talkheader}}
−	{{Article ~~Project~~ Episodes}}	+	{{Article Style Guide Episodes}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, April 13, 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talkheader}}		{{Talkheader}}
−	~~<center>~~{{Article Project Episodes}}~~</center>~~	+	{{Article Project Episodes}}